Which is more entertaining TNA or WWE?

Flor Lizardi: its obviously WWE

Willetta Munhall: that's really glaring that wwe makes more suitable funds than tna and they have more suitable valuable rankings yet in my opinion. Tna is more suitable exciting. there is way more suitable action than the wwe. The wwe is pg rated. more suitable for the youngsters. Tna brings out a lot more suitable tables, chairs. that is a lot more suitable intense. you do not even see blood anymore in the wwe. And the storylines on wwe sucks. you are able to continuously tell what's going to ensue next. Tna is somewhat more suitable wonderful in my opinion...Show more

Bianca Lannier: WWE They Have :UndertakerTriple HJohn CenaRey MysterioCM PunkThe RockTNA Has :Horrible WrestlersWWE RULES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...Show more

Melissa Lavallie: TNA by a long shot. TNA is chaotic and unpredictable, and they take risks, making it more entertaining and fun to watch.The WWE is too "safe", formulaic, and predictable. It's no! t bad for what it does, but I enjoy the chaos and unpredictable-ness of TNA far more.

Burt Cheevers: WWE confuses my mind, with their storylines. like i have no idea who the heel or babyface in Cena Vs Rock fued :S. that's why I'd have to say TNA it's more easy to follow and entertaining too me as well :)

Coy Tapley: WWE

Mel Crapo: wwe.

Luke Gacusan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqtdZFviPLs

Whitley Leopold: WWE. Total No Action wrestling are copycats, riddled with overrated, untalented, and irresponsible employees.

Donny Bankson: TNA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ollie Hamiel: I know WWE is the better company but TNA "in my opinion" is more entertaining, at the moment.